February 27, 2025 – Local Courtroom
In a move that has left legal experts shaking their heads, a newly married man has filed a lawsuit against his wife, claiming that he was “never adequately briefed” on the amount of work involved in a marriage. The plaintiff, identified only as “Daniel P.,” alleges that while he was informed of the joys of married life, there was no mention of “the extreme emotional and logistical labor required to sustain the union.”
“This isn’t what I signed up for,” Daniel told the court, adjusting his suit awkwardly as he continued. “I thought marriage was supposed to be this blissful, effortless adventure—like a two-person vacation—but instead, I’m constantly bombarded with requests to ‘take out the trash,’ ‘pick up groceries,’ and ‘act interested in her day.’”
He further expressed his surprise at how quickly his evenings now revolve around “discussions about the thermostat setting” and “the ever-expanding list of her favorite TV shows” and “never ending discussions about bills and the things I can no longer ‘splurge’ on because I now have to think for two, instead of just myself.”
Judge Evelyn G. Thompson, who presided over the case, couldn’t contain her laughter upon hearing the complaint. “You honestly didn’t know this? This was a complete mystery? You thought you’d just sign a piece of paper and the universe would automatically give you a personalized maid and therapist?” she asked, barely keeping her composure. “I’m sorry, but what you’ve signed up for isn’t just a legally binding contract—it’s a lifetime of ‘negotiations’ about who left the toothpaste cap off.”
Despite his growing frustration, Daniel persisted with his case, citing what he called a “lack of clarity” in his marriage vows, which he claims “didn’t specify how often I would be required to perform non-glamorous tasks.”
At one point during the trial, Daniel’s wife, Michelle P., took the stand and passionately defended herself. “I’m sorry, but I didn’t think I’d need to provide a full PowerPoint presentation on ‘The Reality of Marriage’ before we said ‘I do.’” She paused, then added, “Though I might now. Actually, that sounds like a great idea for next year’s anniversary.”
The judge’s reaction to Michelle’s statement was swift and unmistakable. “Honestly, Daniel, if you think it’s bad now, just wait until you find out about the 3 a.m. ‘which side of the bed is mine’ debate. Especially, since she seems to be implying that she wants to continue this marriage, which is beyond my understanding. But, that is not my job. Therefore, I will move forward with the actual duties of my job. I’m going to rule in your wife’s favor, and I suggest you start practicing your apology speech for your anniversary.”
Daniel attempted to defend himself by stating, “Your honor, I feel I was blindsided…”. However, the judge was having none of it and cut him off with, “You feel? So, you think this is a court of feelings? You believe life is all about how you feel? Let me tell you something, I’m sure she was blindsided by this silly display of cowardly ignorance. I can only imagine how she feels knowing she married you.”
Before adjournment, the judge issued a stern warning to the plaintiff: “Consider this a lesson in real-life education. Marriage is the ultimate hands-on learning experience. You either sink or swim—no manual included. But, I can assure you, it isn’t just about how you feel. Grow up. Take some responsibility. Court is adjourned, but your sentencing, good sir, has just begun.” With that, the judge threw down the gavel and chuckled as she made her exit.
Daniel, still visibly bewildered, left the courthouse with a box of tissues (which he claimed was also a marriage requirement) and a promise to “re-evaluate” his understanding of marital expectations.
In a brief statement to reporters, Michelle was optimistic. “I’m just glad he now understands there are no vacations in this marriage—only ‘staycations,’ and those come with chores. And, after today, more chores than he could have ever imagined.”
FakeTruth4U 
Leave a comment